JIOH on LinkedIn JIOH on Facebook
  • Users Online: 501
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 55-59

Effect of four mouth rinses on microhardness of esthetic restorative material: An In vitro study


Department of Dentistry, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Rosamma George
Department of Dentistry, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan - 573 201, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_21_16

Get Permissions

Aims and Objectives: This in vitro study is designed to evaluate the effect of four mouth rinses on the microhardness of esthetic restorative material. Materials and Methods: Forty specimens of resin composite (Filtek™ P60) material (3M ESPE St. Paul, MN, USA) with 3 mm diameter and 3 mm height were prepared using a plastic mold. The baseline microhardness values of the specimens were recorded using Vickers microhardness tester. The specimens were randomly allocated into four groups, each containing ten specimens as follows - Group I Listerine® (Johnson & Johnson), Group II Colgate Plax®, Group III Freshclor® (Group Pharmaceuticals), and Group IV AloeDent® (Optima, Bradford-Italy). The pH of all mouth rinses was recorded. Then, the specimens were immersed in 20 ml of respective mouth rinses and kept in an incubator at 37°C for 24 h. The change in the microhardness values of the specimens was recorded. The obtained result was subjected to statistical analysis using Wilcoxon signed rank, Kruskal–Wallis, and Mann–Whitney U-tests. SPSS software version 16 and Microsoft Excel version 7 were also used. The level of significance was set at P= 0.05. Results: There was reduction in the microhardness of all the specimens irrespective of the mouthwashes. Group I (Listerine®) showed significant reduction in the microhardness compared to Group II (Colgate Plax®), Group III (Freshclor®), and Group IV (AloeDent®), whereas there was no statistically significant difference between Group III and Group IV. Conclusion: All the mouth rinses showed reduction in surface hardness of the esthetic restorative material. High reduction of surface hardness was shown in Listerine® mouth rinse. There was no statistically significant difference between Freshclor® and AloeDent® mouth rinses.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed483    
    Printed28    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded52    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal