JIOH on LinkedIn JIOH on Facebook
  • Users Online: 20
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 33-40

Soy fermentation by orally isolated putative probiotic Streptococcus salivarius for healthy oral


1 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biosciences, Taylor’s University, Selangor, Malaysia
2 Healthcare Sector, Nano and Advanced Materials Institute Limited, Shatin, Hong Kong

Date of Submission31-Jul-2019
Date of Decision11-Aug-2019
Date of Acceptance09-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication25-Feb-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Joo Ann Ewe
Nano and Advanced Materials Institute Limited, Units 517, 5/F, Lakeside 1, No. 8 Science Park West Avenue, Hong Kong Science Park, N.T
Hong Kong
Dr. Wei Hsum Yap
No. 1 Jalan Taylors, Subang Jaya 47650, Selangor Darul Ehsan
Malaysia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_196_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Aim: Consumption of aglycones-rich fermented soy has been positively associated with the recuperation of systemic inflammation. As oral conditions have an impact on overall health and diseases, the reestablishment of bacteria particularly by indigenous oral probiotic is believed to be able to reverse oral inflammation by antagonize oral pathogen and thus maintaining good oral health. Streptococcus salivarius can be combined with bioactive isoflavone aglycones to further improve oral healthiness. This study aimed to explore decent advantages by indigenous source of Streptococcus isolated from healthy periodontal to ferment soy while maintaining probiotic properties before delivering in product targeting oral health. Materials and Methods: Putative probiotic properties of isolated strains were explored through antibiotic susceptibility ensuring safe strain consumption. S. salivarius from Taylor’s University Culture Collection (TUCC) 1254 was selected for probiotic properties evaluation, in comparison with the type strain. Both strains were evaluated for fermentation ability in soy through growth, β-glucosidase assay, and isoflavone bioconversion. Results: The antagonistic ability of S. salivarius TUCC 1254 was better under anaerobic than microaerobic condition; the strain also showed higher colonizing ability to epithelial tissue than the tooth surface resemblance. The strain showed vast cell growth accompanied by organic acid production and higher β-glucosidase enzyme to bioconvert isoflavone glucosides to bioactive aglycones that could reduce oral inflammation than K12. Soy improved auto-aggregation ability of S. salivarius, which could promote biofilm formation and thus could achieve enhanced oral pathogen-eradicating intention. Conclusion: This study suggested that indigenous bacteria could serve as a better source of oral probiotics and coupling with fermented soy bioactive isoflavone aglycones, become a deliverable platform for improving oral health.

Keywords: Aglycones, Oral Health, Periodontopathogens, Soy Fermentation, Streptococcus Salivarius


How to cite this article:
Choo SM, Yap KY, Yap WH, Ewe JA. Soy fermentation by orally isolated putative probiotic Streptococcus salivarius for healthy oral. J Int Oral Health 2020;12:33-40

How to cite this URL:
Choo SM, Yap KY, Yap WH, Ewe JA. Soy fermentation by orally isolated putative probiotic Streptococcus salivarius for healthy oral. J Int Oral Health [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 3];12:33-40. Available from: http://www.jioh.org/text.asp?2020/12/1/33/279219




  Introduction Top


Soy contains high nutritional value needed to support the growth of most probiotics, particularly, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) of genus Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium.[1] Despite the major sources of probiotics are of gut origin, the concept of probiotics applies to oral health maintenance, and it is believed that an indigenous source could ensure decent advantage. Streptococcus salivarius is one of the most thoroughly studied oral probiotic species due to its presence throughout our lives in the oral cavity.[2] Among the strains of S. salivarius, K12 is the first commercialized oral probiotic and has also been reported to reduce symptoms of halitosis and oral thrush.[2] Lactobacilli isolated from the oral cavity of healthy people have been reported to possess probiotic potential as a result of their adaptive and probiotic properties.[3] Thus, it is worth exploring the diverse pool of beneficial bacteria from healthy host periodontal to expand oral health application. To date, no study exploring healthy periodontal isolated Streptococcus as putative probiotics in antagonizing oral pathogens is available. LABs probiotics produce β-glucosidase enzyme, which can hydrolyze the non-bioactive β-glucosidase into biologically active aglycones during soy milk fermentation.[4] Daidzin, genistin, and glycitin are the three main isoflavone glucosides, which will be converted into their respective bioactive aglycones, namely daidzein, genistein, and glycitein.[4] Fermented soy milk has been found to show bactericidal activity both in in vitro and animal models,[5] attributable to the enhanced aglycones that inhibit bacterial growth. Oral infections always begin with the formation of biofilms where communities of opportunistic pathogens are able to colonize. Considering the joint benefits of oral probiotics and the increased level of aglycones on soy fermentation, the putative probiotic with known efficacy could enhance the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapies for the management of oral health.


  Materials and Methods Top


Subject recruitment and saliva collection: A total of 22 healthy subjects (aged 18–35 years) that fit the inclusion criteria, which included healthy periodontal, not on antibiotics, probiotic products, and chlorhexidine mouthwash during and two weeks before the intervention were included in this study. The protocol of this study was approved by the University Human Ethics Committee (HEC 2017/037). Informed written consent was acquired from each subject that agreed to participate voluntarily. Potential strains of Streptococcus were isolated from the saliva of subjects with healthy periodontal condition. Saliva was collected using Super SAL according to the manufacturing instruction (Universal Saliva Collection Device, Oasis Diagnostics, Vancouver, USA). S. salivarius K12 that was isolated from tablets (BLIS Technologies, Dunedin, New Zealand) was used as a control for subsequent analyses.

Microbial isolation and identification: Decimal dilutions of saliva samples were cultured on Mitis Salivarius (MS) selective agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) supplemented with 1% potassium tellurite (HiMedia) to isolate strains of Streptococcus. Fifteen irregular-shaped light blue colonies with hardened texture on selective agar were picked for gram staining and catalase test as preliminary confirmation. Following this, the identification of isolated Streptococcus was performed according to the Biolog’s Protocol carried out with some minor modification.[6] Results were read and interpreted by the identification system’s software (GEN III OmniLog Database, version 5.2.1, Hayward, California).

Antibiotic susceptibility test assay: Antibiotic susceptibility test was performed according to the study conducted[7] correlated with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2012 (https://clsi.org/) guidelines with some modification.[8] Antibiotic discs containing respective effective concentrations of penicillin, gentamicin, tetracycline, erythromycin, and clindamycin were placed on the bacteria inoculated plate and incubated at 37°C for 24h. It was tested along with negative control strains Staphylococcus aureus American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 29737 and  Escherichia More Details coli ATCC 25922. The diameters of the zone of inhibition were measured, and the results were interpreted.

Antagonistic effect of S. salivarius against oral pathogens: The antagonistic activities of S. salivarius against halitosis causing bacteria, namely Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 10953, clinically isolated Treponema denticola and Streptococcus mutans were investigated.[9] One hundred µL of the activated pathogens with the optical density of 0.3 (at 600nm) were uniformly spread on Tryptic Soy Agar (Merck, New Jersey, United States) supplemented with defibrinated sheep blood. Agar wells of diameter 5mm were cut using sterile cork borer and 20 µL of activated S. salivarius suspension were placed into each agar well and incubated under microaerobic (CO2 incubator, Memmert, Schwabach, Germany) and anaerobic conditions (anaerobic chambers, Whitley DG250 Anaerobic Workstation, West Yorkshire, UK) at 37°C for 24h. Growth inhibitory activity of S. salivarius was recorded by measuring the clear zone around, namely inhibition zone diameter.

Adherence of S. salivarius to human oral squamous cell and hydroxyapatite (HA): The adherence ability of S. salivarius was evaluated on both human oral squamous cell carcinoma (HSC3) cells and HA. The assay for bacterial adhesion to HSC3 cells was performed.[10] Adherence of isolated bacteria toward HA was carried out as described.[11]

Fermentation of soy medium: To assess the suitability of soy as a carrier, its potential was evaluated through pH changes. Soy medium (4% wt/vol) was prepared using soy powder (VIS Foodtech Ingredient Supplies, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia). Five percent (vol/vol) activated S. salivarius were aseptically inoculated into soy medium, and the samples were drawn at intervals of 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24h of fermentation at 37°C for pH determination using calibrated pH-meter (Eutech Instruments, Singapore). Cell viability was performed at interval of 0, 12, and 24h.

Determination of β-glucosidase activity: The intracellular β-glucosidase activity of S. salivarius was determined.[1] It was measured by the rate of hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside as a substrate (pNPG; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri). The protein concentration of the crude enzyme extract was determined using bovine serum albumin as standard.[12] The specific activity was expressed as milliunits (mU) of β-glucosidase activity per milligram of protein.

Determination of isoflavones in soy milk: The concentration of isoflavones was determined using a reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for unfermented and fermented soy milk after extraction.[13] The HPLC-grade isoflavone standards including daidzin, daidzein, glycitin, glycitein, genistin, and genistein (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, United States). The concentration of isoflavones was identified using Shimadzu HPLC (Shimadzu, Japan) fitted with an Inertsil ODS-3 column (150 × 3mm, 5mm, GL Sciences, Tokyo, Japan). The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (water:phosphoric acid, 1000:1, vol/vol) and solvent B (water:acetonitrile:phosphoric acid, 200:800:1, vol/vol/vol) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min in a concentration gradient. The gradient elution was started with solvent A in the sequence of 95% (2min) → 65% (29min) → 50% (31min) → 95% (40min) → 95% (43min). The separation was operated at 40°C, and the detection wavelength was at 259nm.

Aggregation ability of Streptococcus on soy medium fermentation: Briefly, S. salivarius was harvested from soy medium after 24h of fermentation at 37°C. Bacteria suspension in soy medium was then transferred to soy agar (4% wt/vol) plates and incubated at 37°C for 24h. Bacteria colonies were then resuspended in 0.15mol/L sodium chloride solution and incubated at 37°C for 24h. Samples were carefully drawn out without shaking at 0, 6, and 24h to measure the optical density using UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Massachusetts, United States) at 600nm. The aggregation percentage (AP) was measured by using the following formula:

[INLINE 1]

where, ODt (t = 6 or 24h) and OD0 (t = 0h) indicate the optical density of final and initial times, respectively.

Statistical analyses: The Statistical Package for the Social Science Program (SPSS, Chicago, USA), version 20, was used to analyze the data obtained from the tests carried out. Data were compared using one-way analysis of variance, unless otherwise stated. Mean value comparisons were performed using Tukey test. Data presented were mean ± standard deviations from two separate runs with a significance level of α = 0.05.


  Results Top


The 15 strains of Streptococcus isolated in selective medium from healthy subjects were gram positive and catalase negative, with six species of Streptococcus (as in [Table 1]) and one Actinomyces neuii on Biolog identification. Actinomyces neuii and Streptococcus hyointestinalis were eliminated from analyses as they were not orally found commensal bacteria. This indicated the distinctiveness of bacterial flora in oral cavity of every subject.
Table 1: Antibiotics susceptibility profile of Streptococcus

Click here to view


Strains of Streptococcus showed different profiles of antibiotic resistance [Table 1]. The isolated strains, S. salivarius TUCC 1254, were susceptible to penicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin, and clindamycin, and an intermediate susceptibility toward gentamicin. To ensure safe consumption, we chose this strain for subsequent probiotic qualities evaluation.

In general, the streptococci showed antagonistic activity against the common resident harmful pathogens that can lead to oral disorders such as periodontitis and halitosis,[14],[15] the F. nucleatum ATCC 10953, clinically isolated T. denticola and S. mutans [Table 2]. Antagonistic activity of S. salivarius against oral pathogen was observed under both microaerobic and anaerobic environment to resemble the ecological niche environment such as tooth surface and gingival epithelium in oral cavity. Particularly, antagonism ability of the isolated strain S. salivarius TUCC 1254 was better in the absence of oxygen in which the inhibitory activity of this strain toward F. nucleatum, T. denticola, and S. mutans was 18.2% (P = 0.017), 72.7% (P = 0.000), and 69.7% (P = 0.000), respectively, higher under anaerobic than microaerobic condition.
Table 2: Zone of inhibition (mm) of Streptococcus salivarius against periodontal pathogens by agar-well diffusion method

Click here to view


Strains of S. salivarius showed varying levels of adherence toward the HSC3 cell line and HA surface [Table 3]. The strains showed better adhesion to HSC3 cell line (34.5%–83.85% higher, P = 0.000) than HA. S. salivarius TUCC 1254 showed higher adherence potential to oral epithelial tissue such as the tongue and gingival epithelial rather than that to teeth, which thus stands a better chance in eliminating oral pathogens via its antimicrobial ability as shown through antagonistic study [Table 2].
Table 3: Adhesion of Streptococcus salivarius to human oral squamous cell carcinoma and hydroxyapatite

Click here to view


A significant drop of pH in soy media (P = 0.000) in the first 12h on fermentation by the streptococci. The results indicated both S. salivarius K12 and TUCC 1254 actively multiplying while producing higher amount of organic acids during the first 12h of exponential growing before entering stationary phase.

Both strains of S. salivarius were able to grow well in soy medium [Figure 1]. S. salivarius TUCC 1254 increased in twofold on fermentation and showed better growth than S. salivarius K12 in soy medium (P = 0.000). This corresponded well with the reduction of pH in growth medium after 24h (a 9.6% dropped for S. salivarius TUCC 1254; a 7.8% dropped for S. salivarius K12). Such observation reflects niche adaptation capability of bacteria from healthy oral to soy by producing different key enzymes in response to dietary change.[16]
Figure 1: Growth of Streptococcus salivarius K12 (squares) and S. salivarius Taylor’s University Culture Collection (TUCC) 1254 (diamonds) in soy medium for 24h at 37°C. Error bars SEM (n = 2). *Mean values are significantly different (P < 0.05) via independent t-test

Click here to view


There was an increase in titratable acidity of soy media on fermentation by bacteria but the results were strain dependent [Table 4]. S. salivarius K12 and TUCC 1254 produced comparable amounts of organic acids where the pH of the fermented media dropped from 7.4 to 6.7−6.8 [Figure 2].
Table 4: Titratable acidity of Streptococcus salivarius-fermented soy media upon fermentation for 24h at 37°C

Click here to view
,
Figure 2: Changes of pH in Streptococcus salivarius fermented soy media over 24h at 37°C for S. salivarius K12 (squares) and S. salivarius Taylor’s University Culture Collection (TUCC) 1254 (diamonds). Error bars SEM (n = 2). Mean values between the two strains are statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) via independent t-test

Click here to view


S. salivarius TUCC 1254 had significantly higher (P = 0.097) β-glucosidase activity compared to S. salivarius K12 [Table 5], indicating higher efficiency of indigenous bacteria than that of commercially available for potential application.
Table 5: β-Glucosidase activity from cell extracts of Streptococcus salivarius on fermentation in de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe media at 37°C for 24 h

Click here to view


Fermented soy milk contained higher amount of isoflavone aglycones than glucosides in unfermented soy milk [Table 6]. The concentration of aglycones (daidzein, glycitein, and genistein) in soy milk fermented by S. salivarius TUCC 1254 was substantially (P = 0.000) higher than that by S. salivarius K12, attributable to the higher β-glucosidase activity.
Table 6: Concentrations of isoflavones in unfermented soymilk and Streptococcus salivarius-fermented soy milk on fermentation at 37°C for 24 h

Click here to view


The adhesion of Streptococcus has enhanced on growing in soy as shown by the auto-aggregating ability of the cells with prolong incubation from 12th to 24th h [Figure 3]. Both strains aggregated better at 24th h than at 12th h (S. salivarius K12: P = 0.000; TUCC 1254: P = 0.000). S. salivarius K12 appeared to consistently having better aggregation than TUCC 1254 at the 12th h (P = 0.004) and the 24th h (P = 0.005). Such interaction of bacteria to promote aggregation with oral probiotic is important as this could inhibit or reduce the dental plaque formation.[17]
Figure 3: Aggregation percentage of Streptococcus salivarius K12 (squares) and S. salivarius Taylor’s University Culture Collection (TUCC) 1254 (diamonds) after 12 and 24h incubation at 37°C. Results are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation, Error bars, standard error of mean (SEM) (n = 2). *Indicated significantly different (P < 0.05) via paired t-test

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Microflora of the healthy cavity had been profiled a decade ago where it indicates that distinctive species usually colonizes with site and subject specific.[18] With specific characteristic features of S. salivarius colony on the selective MS agar,[19] which revealed irregular-shaped light blue colonies with hardened texture and gum drop appearance, they can be easily isolated.

There has been increasing interest in the use of probiotics for the management of oral infections. Burton et al.[20] reported that only 60% of subjects in the study possessed S. salivarius strain in their saliva before probiotic intervention. Specific screenings for selecting appropriate strains are crucial to ensure the functionality and safety of the newly isolated strains. Despite studies about probiotic for oral management has been increasing tremendously, till date, guidelines outlining probiotic properties are of gastrointestinal health point of view.[21] Regardless of target sites, the mechanism of actions recommended for oral probiotics resembles gastrointestinal species. For instance, strains safety, adhesion ability, and antagonism activity toward pathogenic strains.

Antibiotics have been used extensively in the treatment of bacterial infection, and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains has posed a serious threat for the future.[18] The safety issue of the putative probiotic is of special concern as there is rapid expansion of probiotic market, which leads to increased probiotic consumption in the society.[14],[22] The antibiotic susceptibility profile of the chosen strain S. salivarius TUCC 1254 resembled S. salivarius K12 with a low possibility of harboring antibiotic-resistant genes, thereby it is recommended to be incorporated as food adjunct.

Antagonistic test was performed in the attempt of replacing bacteria responsible for oral disorders with isolated bacteria, to establish a balance ratio in the oral microbial community to achieve oral well-being. It is believed that the orally isolated S. salivarius could provide a potential pool of putative probiotic-targeting oral cavity. The distinct environmental conditions of anaerobic and microaerobic cultivation have been found to cause suppression of different pathogens by probiotic bacteria through acidification of cytoplasm in the pathogenic strains. The oxygen tension during incubation has affected the growth and secretion of organic acids and bacteriocin production by certain species.[23] Results obtained from our tested strains showed higher inhibition zone when cultivated under anaerobic condition. We postulated that the secretion of organic acids and bacteriocins in S. salivarius studied against pathogens could have been induced more under anaerobic condition for better inhibition.

The ability to adhere to the host cell surfaces has been suggested to be a crucial selection criterion to be used as probiotics.[24] The high adhesion capacity of the bacteria is presumably due to the surface adhesion where S. salivarius had been reported to possess multiple adhesive strategies that enable it to bind on various biological surfaces.[18] The binding of S. salivarius to human cell is mediated by the specific interactions between the adhesins and the complementary receptors. Glycoprotein AgC and a 27kDa protein are the components that promoted the binding of S. salivarius to oral epithelial cells and salivary–glycoprotein EP–GP, respectively. The proficiency of bacterial adhesins has been found to be affected by the differences in the level of charge, hydrophobicity, and structure of cell surface of bacteria.[25] Thus, S. salivarius TUCC1254 could have possessed the adhesin that enabled it to adhere and colonize better to oral epithelial tissue, which then antagonized the anaerobic halitosis-causing oral pathogens.

It seems feasible to incorporate S. salivarius isolated from the original habitat in human oral cavity as this strain is most prevalent in healthy subjects.[26]Streptococcus is a facultative anaerobe. It could metabolize the carbon source in soy medium and cause reduction of pH level.[27] As there is no history of using S. salivarius for soy fermentation, medium acidity was first used as an indicator to assess the growing pattern of Streptococcus in soy medium. Soluble sugars can be found in soy, including stachyose, raffinose, sucrose, glucose, galactose, and fructose.[28] Type strain S. salivarius K12 has been reported to carry oxidase reaction enzyme, the β-glucosidase, and has been found to be able to hydrolyze d-raffinose.[28] The marginal increase in organic acid [Table 4] and slight drop in pH [Figure 2], yet enormous growth of S. salivarius [Figure 1] in soy, which was observed in this study, could be attributable to its ability to produce key enzymes to use carbohydrate sources in the growth medium as a result of niche adaptation.[16]

Till date, no study has been conducted to analyze the β-glucosidase activity on S. salivarius in fermented soy milk. However, the presence of enzyme β-glucosidase in S. salivarius K12 was confirmed in a submitted generally recognized as safe (GRAS) exemption claim report to food and drug administration.[29] The indigenous S. salivarius TUCC 1254 produced higher amount of β-glucosidase that led to production of higher bioactive aglycones that was bioavailable on fermentation. Such observation indicates the prospect of using native source could offer better anticipation.

Auto-aggregation measurements are widely used as an indirect method for evaluating the adhesion capacity of bacteria, including potential probiotics.[30] Oral infections always begin with the formation of biofilms where communities of microorganisms gather together with a slimy matrix.[31] Observation from the results suggested longer incubation period, which resulted in higher AP. The increased aggregation of S. salivarius on prolonged incubation in soy has suggested that the changes of surface properties were due to growth media,[32] which enabled the bacteria to form biofilm for colonization but prohibited the deposition of pathogens locally.

Taken together, this study successfully identified the orally isolated S. salivarius TUCC 1254 as a putative probiotic candidate with known efficiency, particularly anti-oral pathogens potential. This β-glucosidase enzymes possessing strain enhanced aglycones content is expected to improve oral health, including reducing the occurrence of halitosis. Although the presence of resistance genes among the strains of Streptococcus indicates the need of in-depth research on the characterization of the resistant determinants, which is crucial so as to reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance development. It is believed that the subsequent study on oral health improvement would benefit from using the S. salivarius TUCC 1254-fermented soy as the medium for in vivo trial.

Ethical policy and institutional review board statement

This study did not involve clinical trial. Ethical approval was obtained for the collection of saliva samples from healthy subjects voluntarily. This study was approved by Taylors’ University Human Ethics Committee (TUHEC) on December 19, 2017. All the procedures have been performed as per the ethical guidelines laid down by the Declaration of Helsinki (1964).

Data availability statement

The data set used in this study is available on request from Dr. Ewe Joo Ann (jooann.ewe@gmail.com).

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Professor John Tagg for sponsoring Streptococcus salivarius K12 used in this study and Professor Song Keang Peng for advising about the oral pathogens antagonistic study.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia via Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) (FRGS/1/2014/SG05/TAYLOR/03/2) and Taylor’s University through its Postgraduate Research Scholarship Program.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Ewe JA, Wan-Abdullah WN, Liong MT. ACE inhibitory activity and bioconversion of isoflavones by Lactobacillus in soymilk supplemented with B-vitamins. Br Food J 2011;113:1127-46.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Zupancic K, Kriksic V, Kovacevic I, Kovacevic D. Influence of oral probiotic streptococcus salivarius K12 on ear and oral cavity health in humans: Systematic review. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2017;9:102-10.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chervinets Y, Chervinets V, Shenderov B, Belyaeva E, Troshin A, Lebedev S, et al. Adaptation and probiotic potential of lactobacilli, isolated from the oral cavity and intestines of healthy people. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2018;10:22-33.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sirilun S, Sivamaruthi BS, Kesika P, Peerajan S, Chaiyasut C. Lactic acid bacteria mediated fermented soybean as a potent nutraceutical candidate. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2017;7:930-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sanjukta S, Rai AK, Sahoo D. Bioactive molecules in fermented soybean products and their potential health benefits. In: Ray RC, Montet D, editors. Fermented Foods, Part II: Technological Interventions. London, U.K: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2017. p. 97-121.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wragg P, Randall L, Whatmore AM. Comparison of biolog GEN III microstation semi-automated bacterial identification system with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing for the identification of bacteria of veterinary interest. J Microbiol Methods 2014;105:16-21.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Grinwis ME, Sibley CD, Parkins MD, Eshaghurshan CS, Rabin HR, Surette MG. Macrolide and clindamycin resistance in Streptococcus milleri group isolates from the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:2823-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Barbour A, Philip K. Variable characteristics of bacteriocin-producing Streptococcus salivarius strains isolated from Malaysian subjects. PLoS One 2014;9:e100541.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bosch M, Nart J, Audivert S, Bonachera MA, Alemany AS, Fuentes MC, et al. Isolation and characterization of probiotic strains for improving oral health. Arch Oral Biol 2012;57:539-49.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Muñoz-Quezada S, Chenoll E, Vieites JM, Genovés S, Maldonado J, Bermúdez-Brito M, et al. Isolation, identification and characterisation of three novel probiotic strains (Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-4034, Bifidobacterium breve CNCM I-4035 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036) from the faeces of exclusively breast-fed infants. Br J Nutr 2013;109:S51-62.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gibbons RJ, Moreno EC, Spinell DM. Model delineating the effects of a salivary pellicle on the adsorption of Streptococcus miteor onto hydroxyapatite. Infect Immun 1976;14:1109-12.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976;72:248-54.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Yeo SK, Liong MT. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity and bioconversion of isoflavones by probiotics in soymilk supplemented with prebiotics. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2010;61: 161-81.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Allaker RP, Stephen AS. Use of probiotics and oral health. Curr Oral Health Rep 2017;4:309-18.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Gungor OE, Kirzioglu Z, Kivanc M. Probiotics: Can they be used to improve oral health? Benef Microbes 2015;6:647-56.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Zhu A, Sunagawa S, Mende DR, Bork P. Inter-individual differences in the gene content of human gut bacterial species. Genome Biol 2015;16:82.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Couvigny B, Kulakauskas S, Pons N, Quinquis B, Abraham AL, Meylheuc T, et al. Identification of new factors modulating adhesion abilities of the pioneer commensal bacterium streptococcus salivarius. Front Microbiol 2018;9:273.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Seminario-amez M, López-lópez J, Estrugo-devesa A, Ayuso-montero R, Jané- E. Probiotics and oral health : A systematic review. 2017;22:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kim YH, Lee SY. Identification of non-streptococcal organisms from human dental plaque grown on the streptococcus-selective medium Mitis-Salivarius agar. Arch Oral Biol 2015;60:267-71.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Burton JP, Wescombe PA, Macklaim JM, Chai MH, Macdonald K, Hale JD, et al. Persistence of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius M18 is dose dependent and megaplasmid transfer can augment their bacteriocin production and adhesion characteristics. PLoS One 2013;8:e65991.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Stowik TA. Contribution of probiotics Streptococcus salivarius strains K12 and M18 to oral health in humans: A review contribution of probiotics Streptococcus salivarius strains K12 and M18 to oral health in humans. Honors Scholar Theses 2016;488:1-27.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Reid G, Kumar H, Khan AI, Rautava S, Tobin J, Salminen S. The case in favour of probiotics before, during and after pregnancy: Insights from the first 1,500 days. Benef Microbes 2016;7:353-62.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hütt P, Shchepetova J, Lõivukene K, Kullisaar T, Mikelsaar M. Antagonistic activity of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against entero- and uropathogens. J Appl Microbiol 2006;100:1324-32.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Balakrishna A. In vitro evaluation of adhesion and aggregation abilities of four potential probiotic strains isolated from guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Brazilian Arch Biol Technol 2013;56:793-800.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Chaffanel F, Charron-Bourgoin F, Soligot C, Kebouchi M, Bertin S, Payot S, et al. Surface proteins involved in the adhesion of streptococcus salivarius to human intestinal epithelial cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2018;102:2851-65.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Jain P, Sharma P. Probiotics and their efficacy in improving oral health: A review. J Appl Pharm Sci 2012;2:151-63.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Buckley ND, Champagne CP, Masotti AI, Wagar LE, Tompkins TA, Green-Johnson JM. Harnessing functional food strategies for the health challenges of space travel fermented soy for astronaut nutrition. Acta Astronaut 2011;68:731-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Wang D, Beyersdorf J, Bennett GN. Efficient free fatty acid production in engineered Escherichia coli strains using soybean oligosaccharides as feedstock. Biotechnol Prog 2015;31:686-694  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
BLIS Technologies. GRAS Exemption Claim for Streptococcus salivarius K12. GRAS Not 2015;477:1-126.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Grigoryan S, Bazukyan I, Trchounian A. Aggregation and adhesion activity of lactobacilli isolated from fermented products in vitro and in vivo: A potential probiotic strain. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2018;10:269-76.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Neto CC, Penndorf KA, Feldman M, Meron-Sudai S, Zakay-Rones Z, Steinberg D, et al. Characterization of non-dialyzable constituents from cranberry juice that inhibit adhesion, co-aggregation and biofilm formation by oral bacteria. Food Funct 2017;8:1955-65.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Zeraik AE, Nitschke M. Influence of growth media and temperature on bacterial adhesion to polystyrene surfaces. Brazilian Arch Biol Technol 2012;55:569-76.  Back to cited text no. 32
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed91    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded14    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]