JIOH on LinkedIn JIOH on Facebook
  • Users Online: 339
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 24-29

Age-related changes in tooth dimensions in adults in Shiraz, Iran


1 Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Department of Anatomy, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences, Iranshahr, Iran

Date of Web Publication17-Jan-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rashin Giti
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Qasrodasht Street, Qomabad Avenue, Shiraz.
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_148_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to determine the biometric dimensions of three human permanent teeth in the occlusal/incisal-cervical and apical, buccolingual, and mesiodistal directions, and its relationship with age in adults in Shiraz, Iran. Materials and Methods: The samples included 50 upper canines, 50 maxillary first premolars, and 50 maxillary second molars, extracted from patients aged 25–55 years. Total length, crown labial surface length, crown palatal surface length, crown mesiodistal width, root length, and some other biometrical characteristics of the teeth were measured by using a Vernier caliper with 0.05-mm accuracy. The samples were divided into two age groups: patients aged below 45 years (younger adults group), and those aged over 45 years (older adults group). The data were analyzed by using independent t-test. P < 0.05 was considered as the significance level. Results: Most parameters such as the total length, crown mesiodistal and labiopalatal width, as well as the root length decreased in older adults group in all the three tested permanent teeth. Conclusion: During a lifetime, the crown length, mesiodistal, and buccolingual dimensions seem to decrease because of the physiological and pathological tooth wear. The tooth wear in a mesiodistal dimension is more frequent in posterior teeth than in the anterior ones.

Keywords: Aging, Tooth Dimensions, Tooth Shape, Tooth Size, Tooth Wear


How to cite this article:
Farzin M, Giti R, Heidari E. Age-related changes in tooth dimensions in adults in Shiraz, Iran. J Int Oral Health 2020;12, Suppl S1:24-9

How to cite this URL:
Farzin M, Giti R, Heidari E. Age-related changes in tooth dimensions in adults in Shiraz, Iran. J Int Oral Health [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 18];12, Suppl S1:24-9. Available from: http://www.jioh.org/text.asp?2020/12/7/24/276083


  Introduction Top


Differences in size, shape, arrangement, and wear pattern of the teeth have long been of great interest to physical anthropologists.[1] Throughout the life, the teeth are exposed to different risk factors such as abrasive habits and diets, which can cause attrition, abrasion, abfraction, and erosion, all described in a general term as “tooth wear.”[2],[3],[4],[5]

Tooth wear can be physiological (normal) or pathological; they should be differentiated.[6] Premature tooth wear often causes hypersensitivity, aesthetic, and psychological problem; severe cases may even lead to loss of the tooth vitality.[7],[8] Evidence has proven the tooth wear to be a common condition, which increases with aging within the permanent dentition.[9],[10] Regardless of the physiological or pathological nature of the tooth wear, early interventions are necessary to prevent the problem exacerbation and the need for broad prosthetic restorations.[7] Remodeling of the dentoalveolar hard tissue is also triggered by occlusal and proximal dental wear, aging, pathologies, and trauma. The mechanism of remodeling maintains masticatory function.[11],[12]

In the near future, the population of elderly people will be far larger than ever before; subsequently, prevention and treatment of severe tooth wear will be a rising problem. Moreover, the inherent differences in tooth morphology, which are related to the tooth shape, size, and position in the dental arch, can greatly affect the aesthetic and the tendency for plaque accumulation. The latter is the leading factor in initiation and progression of caries and periodontal diseases.[13] Little information is available about tooth dimension and tooth wear and the contributing factors in the general population. Moreover, the comparability of the study results is limited due to the variety of assessment indices. Some studies have reported that factors such as age, ethnicity,[14] genetics,[15] sex,[16] environmental condition, and secular trend[17],[18] can influence the tooth morphology in different populations. However, the extent of effect of these factors is unclear.

Schierz et al.[19] found that aging increased the occlusal tooth wear scores and dentine exposure in the adult population of Germany. Another study on the United States population found that the extent and type of tooth wear was related to age and location of the teeth; the dentists managed different types of tooth wear with dissimilar methods in that population.[3] Despite the importance of tooth size and tooth wear, and the need for preventive and early treatments to gravel the progression of tooth wear, there is not enough published information about the age-related changes of tooth size in the Iranian population. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the biometrical characteristics of three permanent teeth of adult patients of different ages in Shiraz, Southern Iran. The null hypothesis was that aging would not affect the tooth dimensions in this population.


  Materials and Methods Top


This cross-sectional study was performed on 150 permanent teeth including 50 upper canines, 50 maxillary first premolars, and 50 maxillary second molars, divided into two age groups of 25–45 years (younger adults group) and 46–55 years (older adults group) for both male and female (n = 25 per group). The teeth were selected from those extracted from patients referring to School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, during a one-year period (2018–2019). Informed consent was obtained from all patients, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (No. 0457/18-19). The inclusion criteria were being aged 25–55 years, and having the teeth extracted for orthodontic purposes or periodontal treatments. The teeth with carious lesions were excluded from the study.

The teeth were rinsed with distilled water and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. Biometrical characters of the teeth, such as the total length, crown labial surface length, crown palatal surface length, crown mesiodistal width, crown labiopalatal width, and root length, were measured by using a Vernier caliper (Mini Electronic Caliper, INSIZE, Suzhou, China) with 0.05-mm accuracy.

The total tooth length was measured between the highest points of the crown and the root along the center of the cervical margin. The crown length and the root length were recorded from the center of cervical margin to the highest points of the crown and the root in each labial and palatal surface [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. The crown palatal surface length of canine was measured from the highest point of linguoincisal line angle to the center of cervical margin on the palatal surface. The mesiodistal and labiopalatal width were measured from the most prominent points on each surface to the other one [Figure 3] and [Figure 4].
Figure 1: The lengths were measured between the highest points of the crown and the root along the center of the cervical margin

Click here to view
,
Figure 2: (A) Mesiodistal width of the crown was measured between the most prominent points of each surface. (B) Labiopalatal width of the crown was measured between the most prominent points of each surface

Click here to view
,
Figure 3: Total length of the first premolar teeth in older adults group (A) and younger adults group (B)

Click here to view
,
Figure 4: Crown labiopalatal width of canine teeth in older adults group

Click here to view


Statistical analysis: The statistical analyses were performed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). Independent t-test was used to compare the mean values between the two age groups for the three types of permanent teeth. P < 0.05 was considered as the significance level.


  Results Top


[Table 1] represents the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of all measured dimensions of the upper canine permanent teeth in both age groups. The results of independent t-test showed that the mean values of the total length, crown labial surface length, and root length in older adults group were significantly lower than that in younger adults group (P < 0.05). The mean ± SD of all the measured dimensions of the maxillary first premolar teeth are listed in [Table 2], showing significant reduction in the total length, crown palatal surface length, crown labiopalatal width, and root length in older adults group (P < 0.05). However, the reduction of crown labial surface length (P = 0.1) and crown mesiodistal width (P = 0.3) in the maxillary first premolar was not statistically significant.
Table 1: Comparison of the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the measured dimensions (mm) in human maxillary canine between the two age groups (patients <45 and >45 years)

Click here to view
,
Table 2: Comparison of the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the measured dimensions (mm) in human maxillary first premolar between the two age groups (patients <45 and >45 years)

Click here to view


[Table 3] shows the mean ± SD of all measured dimensions in the second maxillary molar teeth. All measurements had decreased in older adults group. The differences were statistically significant for total length, crown labial surface length, crown palatal surface length, crown mesiodistal width, and root length (P < 0.05). However, the reduction in the crown labiopalatal width value was not statistically significant (P = 0.21).
Table 3: Comparison of the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the measured dimensions (mm) in human maxillary second molar between the two age groups (patients <45 and >45 years; n = 25 per group)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The null hypothesis was rejected based on the evidence, which showed that the reduction of crown size could happen as a result of aging. The three tooth dimensions of total length, crown labial surface length, and crown palatal surface length decreased in the older adults group for the three tested permanent teeth. But, the dimensional decrease was not significant for crown palatal surface length in canine and crown labial surface length in the first premolar.

Generally, different factors such as bruxism, sex,[20] habits, and crowding[4],[5],[10] can induce the loss of non-carious tooth structure (including attrition, abrasion, and erosion). Different authors reported age as a dominant factor for occlusal tooth wear, and detected a negative relationship between the age and crown length.[19],[21],[22] Bartlett and O’Toole[14] found that aging increased the rate of occlusal and incisal tooth wear. Schierz et al.[19] showed the age-related linear progress in tooth wear in a German population. In a study by Pontes and Prietsch,[23] the individuals older than 40 years reported a higher prevalence of sleep bruxism and tooth wear, although the prevalence of these two factors were not significantly different between the sexes in the population of Rio Grande, Brazil. These studies were comparable with the results of this study, which found that the tooth wear increased in the older adults group (>45 years old). However, Seligman et al.[24] noted no statistically significant difference between the age groups. Their different findings could be related to the limited age range of 20–40 years, whereas the age range in this study was 25–55 years.

As tooth wear is not reversible, undoubtedly severer tooth wear is found in the elderly population. The higher rate of the second molar wear in this study would be attributed to mastication of more fibrous and hard food with the posterior teeth.[25] In line with this study, Masotti et al.,[26] who studied Italian population, detected significantly different wear directions between the anterior (oblique and flat) and posterior (oblique and concave) teeth in both sexes. Moreover, significant age-related differences were observed in wear direction and level in the incisors, canines, and premolars, the wear being significantly higher in the older age group. Surprisingly, Schierz et al.[19] noticed more tooth wear in the anterior teeth due to the lack of effective anterior guidance.

This study found the reduction of crown length to be higher in the palatal surface of the maxillary first premolar (crown palatal surface length) than the labial surface (crown labial surface length). The reason might be the higher wear of functional cusp (palatal cusp) compared with the nonfunctional cusp (buccal cusp) during different functional activities. Littleton[27] documented the rapid advancement of dental wear during the life, but no difference was observed between the sexes regarding the wear pattern in the population of South Australia. Although disproportionate anterior wear occurred among the juveniles and young adults, by middle adulthood, the pattern was less variable and more involved the premolars. Old adults had a much flatter pattern of wear in that population. Our findings also revealed reduction in tooth size in mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of all the studied permanent teeth; however, they were not significant for canine, crown mesiodistal width in premolar, and crown labiopalatal width in the second molar. Tooth wear was found to happen not only in an occluso-cervical but also in mesiodistal dimension.[28],[29]

According to Sarig et al.,[30] the environmental factors had more effect than the genetics on the reduction of mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of the teeth. They found the proximal attritional facets to have increased by aging, which was consistent with this study.

This study found that the crown mesiodistal width mainly decreased for the second molar in the adults of older age. Another study showed that the proximal tooth wear chiefly affected the posterior teeth due to the mesial drift of the arches, as well as masticating harder foods with the posterior teeth rather than the anterior ones.[11]

In this study, reduction was also observed in the labio-palatal width; however, it was solely significant for the first premolar. Bartlett et al.[31] found a considerable correlation between the buccolingual tooth erosion and acid reflux, recurrent vomiting, aggressive toothbrushing, use of abrasive toothpastes, residence in rural areas, and acidic intakes. They also detected a moderate increase in tooth wear in the buccolingual dimension with age,[31] which was detectable despite the limited age range. It was in agreement with the results of this study.

The higher prevalence of labiopalatal tooth wear in the first premolar can be related to its lower enamel thickness compared with the other tested teeth in this study, and also chewing the hard foods with the premolar teeth. It was found that positioning of the food bolus during mastication depends on the consistency of food; that is, the tougher the food is, the greater the individual’s preference would be for using the premolar region.[32] Another reason may be the easier accessibility of premolars for brushing and the higher exposure to abrasive toothpastes.[31]

Another considerable finding of this study was the significant decrease of root length in all the three permanent teeth with aging. Moyers[33] reported that 90% of all teeth revealed evidence of idiopathic root resorption throughout the life. He also announced most of the resorption to be mild and restricted to the apical blunting, but almost 10% of them showed resorption of 2–4 mm.

Kaya et al.[34] evaluated the effect of aging on the dimensions of upper incisor root canals by using cone-beam computerized tomography. They found that the root length did not change with aging, whereas the pulp width did.

On the contrary, another study reported age-related deposition of cementum throughout the life, which was meant to compensate for the tooth wear and remodeling. That study also observed that the apices of all teeth looked rounded as a result of continued cementum deposition.[35] It contrasted the finding of this study. Seemingly, there is not a single factor responsible for the root resorption or cementum apposition during the life, and they can happen in different manners in each single individual.

The limitation of this study was evaluation of the tooth dimensions in only three permanent teeth (one anterior and two posterior) in two age groups. Further studies are suggested to investigate the age-related changes in the dimensions of other permanent teeth.

Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the crown length decreases due to the physiological and pathological tooth wear during the life. Moreover, the root length can decrease due to resorption. The mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of the teeth partly decrease with aging because of the proximal tooth wear and perhaps aggressive toothbrushing. Finally, this study concluded that the tooth wear in a mesiodistal dimension occurs more in posterior teeth rather than the anterior ones.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Farhad Mohammadi for his precious help with the statistical analyses, and Ms. Farzaneh Rasouli for proofreading and English editing of the manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Puri N, Pradhan KL, Chandna A, Sehgal V, Gupta R. Biometric study of tooth size in normal, crowded, and spaced permanent dentitions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:279.e7-14.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hirsch C. No increased risk of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism in children and adolescents during orthodontic therapy. J Orofac Orthop 2009;70:39-50.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kanzow P, Biermann J, Wiegand A. Questionnaire survey on the management of erosive tooth wear. Oral Health Prev Dent 2019;22:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Knezevic A, Nyamaa I, Tarle Z, Kunzelmann KH. In vitro assessment of human dentin wear resulting from toothbrushing. J Calif Dent Assoc 2010;38:109-13.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pace F, Pallotta S, Tonini M, Vakil N, Bianchi Porro G. Systematic review: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dental lesions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;27:1179-86.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bartlett D. A proposed system for screening tooth wear. Br Dent J 2010;208:207-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lee A, He LH, Lyons K, Swain MV. Tooth wear and wear investigations in dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:217-25.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Spijker AVt, Rodriguez JM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Bartlett DW, Creugers NH. Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:35-42.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kreulen CM, Van ‘t Spijker A, Rodriguez JM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH, Bartlett DW. Systematic review of the prevalence of tooth wear in children and adolescents. Caries Res 2010;44:151-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Zhang Q, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Bartlett DW, Creugers NH. Occlusal tooth wear in Chinese adults with shortened dental arches. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:101-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
d’Incau E, Couture C, Maureille B. Human tooth wear in the past and the present: Tribological mechanisms, scoring systems, dental and skeletal compensations. Arch Oral Biol 2012;57:214-29.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Margvelashvili A, Zollikofer CP, Lordkipanidze D, Peltomäki T, Ponce de León MS. Tooth wear and dentoalveolar remodeling are key factors of morphological variation in the Dmanisi mandibles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:17278-83.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Aidara AW, Bourgeois D. [Prevalence of dental caries: National pilot study comparing the severity of decay (CAO) vs ICDAS index in Senegal]. Odontostomatol Trop 2014;37:53-63.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bartlett D, O’Toole S. Tooth wear and aging. Aust Dent J 2019;64:59-62.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Townsend GC, Brown T. Heritability of permanent tooth size. Am J Phys Anthropol 1978;49:497-504.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kaushal S, Patnaik V, Agnihotri G. Mandibular canines in sex determination. J Anat Soc India 2003;52:119-24.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Cabrera CAG, Pinzan A, Cabrera MdC, Henriques JFC, Janson G, Freitas MRd. Biometric study of human teeth. Dental Press J Orthod 2011;16:111-22.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Townsend G, Hughes T, Luciano M, Bockmann M, Brook A. Genetic and environmental influences on human dental variation: A critical evaluation of studies involving twins. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54:S45-51.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Schierz O, Dommel S, Hirsch C, Reissmann DR. Occlusal tooth wear in the general population of Germany: Effects of age, sex, and location of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:465-71.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Trombley TM, Agarwal SC, Beauchesne PD, Goodson C, Candilio F, Coppa A, et al. Making sense of medieval mouths: Investigating sex differences of dental pathological lesions in a late medieval Italian community. Am J Phys Anthropol 2019;169:253-69.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
George R, Chell A, Chen B, Undery R, Ahmed H. Dental erosion and dentinal sensitivity amongst professional wine tasters in south east Queensland, Australia. Sci World J 2014;2014:516975.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Jayawardena CK, Abesundara AP, Nanayakkara DC, Chandrasekara MS. Age-related changes in crown and root length in Sri Lankan Sinhalese. J Oral Sci 2009;51:587-92.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Pontes LdS, Prietsch SOM. Sleep bruxism: Population based study in people with 18 years or more in the city of Rio Grande, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2019;22:e190038.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Seligman DA, Pullinger AG, Solberg WK. The prevalence of dental attrition and its association with factors of age, gender, occlusion, and TMJ symptomatology. J Dent Res 1988;67:1323-33.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kim WH, Nam SE, Park YS, Lee SP. Maxillary first molar wear: A longitudinal study of children. Anat Cell Biol 2018;51:251-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Masotti S, Bogdanic N, Arnaud J, Cervellati F, Gualdi-Russo E. Tooth wear pattern analysis in a sample of Italian early bronze age population. Proposal of a 3-D sampling sequence. Arch Oral Biol 2017;74:37-45.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Littleton J. Dental wear and age grading at Roonka, South Australia. Am J Phys Anthropol 2017;163:519-30.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Chandrasekara M. Crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in Sri Lankans. Sri Lanka Dent J 1999;28:15-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Peiris R, Nanayakkara D, Kageyama I. Crown dimensions of the mandibular molars in two ethnic groups in Sri Lanka. Anthropol Sci 2006;114:89-92.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Sarig R, Hershkovitz I, Shvalb N, Sella-Tunis T, May H, Vardimon AD. Proximal attrition facets: Morphometric, demographic, and aging characteristics. Eur J Oral Sci 2014;122:271-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Bartlett DW, Lussi A, West NX, Bouchard P, Sanz M, Bourgeois D. Prevalence of tooth wear on buccal and lingual surfaces and possible risk factors in young European adults. J Dent 2013;41:1007-13.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Liu B, Zhang M, Chen Y, Yao Y. Tooth wear in aging people: An investigation of the prevalence and the influential factors of incisal/occlusal tooth wear in northwest china. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:65.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Kaya S, Adiguzel O, Yavuz I, Tumen EC, Akkus Z. Cone-beam dental computerized tomography for evaluating changes of aging in the dimensions central superior incisor root canals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e463-6.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Muylle S, Simoens P, Lauwers H. Age-related morphometry of equine incisors. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1999;46:633-43.  Back to cited text no. 35
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed90    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded22    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]