JIOH on LinkedIn JIOH on Facebook
  • Users Online: 4
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
This article has been cited by
1Biomechanical preparation in primary molars using manual and three NiTi instruments: a cone-beam-computed tomographic in vitro study
A. Manker,M. Solanki,A. Tripathi,M. L. Jain
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry.2020;21(2)203
[DOI]
2A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing rotary canal instrumentation techniques with manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth
S. Manchanda,D. Sardana,C. K. Y. Yiu
International Endodontic Journal.2020;53(3)333
[DOI]
3Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial
G. Jeevanandan,L. Govindaraju
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry.2018;19(4)273
[DOI]
4Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
P. Priyadarshini,G. Jeevanandan,L. Govindaraju,E. M. G. Subramanian
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry.2020;21(6)693
[DOI]
5Assessment of Quality of Obturation, Instrumentation Time and Intensity of Pain with Pediatric Rotary File (Kedo-S) in Primary Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Lavanya Govindaraju,Subramanian EMG,Satish Vishawanathaiah
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry.2018;11(6)462
[DOI]
6Comparative evaluation of instrumentation time, obturation time, and radiographic quality of obturation using two rotary systems and manual technique for primary molar pulpectomies In vivo study
HeeralSureshkumar Shah,VishwasMohanrao Patil,AnanthP Kamath,AditiAnmol Mathur
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.2021;12(1)55
[DOI]